Skip to Content

Chapter 05 - MPLAB® Mindi™ Analog Simulator - COT Buck Regulators with External Ripple Injection

Last modified by Microchip on 2023/11/10 10:59
Contents

This chapter presents a few ordinary tests that can be performed using Microchip Constant-On-Time (COT) Buck Regulators with external ripple injection.

5.1 Prerequisites

Back to Top

5.2 COT Buck Regulators with External Ripple Injection Experiments

The goal of these case studies is to understand:

  • The impact of input voltage,
  • Load current and passive components to the quality of the output voltage during HLL and CCM modes,
  • Startups in different loading conditions,
  • And the effect of the ripple injection circuitry and feedback resistors on the stability and load step response of the system.

Back to Top

5.3 Case Study: HLL/CCM Mode Selection Effects

The purpose of this section is:

  • To understand the HLL and CCM modes of operation,
  • To visualize the switching and output voltage waveform for each mode of operation and observe the transition between the two modes of operation.

The accompanying figure shows the control loop timing during the steady-state operation of a COT-controlled power supply in CCM.

cot operation

The accompanying figure shows the control loop timing during the steady-state operation of a COT-controlled power supply in HLL.

control loop timing

5.3.1 Mode Simulation Examples

Open the (MIC28515) Buck example, startup application schematic from Power Management > Switching Regulators > MIC28515.
Remove PVDD, VDD, PG, EN, FREQ, EXTVDD, SVIN, VIN, BST, ILIM, FB, IVIN, ISVIN, ICIN1, ICIN2, Icout1 and Icout2 probes and restore connections where needed.

Rename them as desired and use the same graph name for each (e.g.: Switching).

switching name

Add a waveform generator on the MODE pin and edit its parameters as in the accompanying example.

mode pin waveform generator

Increase the simulation time to 25 ms and modify the R2 (Load resistor) value to 300.
Drag the cursors to measure the desired parameter, and zoom in on the MODE transition to visualize different parameters. Note the Inductor current, Input Current Consumption, and Output Voltage waveform.

Back to Top

5.4 Case Study: Start-up with High Load or High Output Capacitance

The purpose of this section is to understand the effect of high output capacitance or high load on the startup capabilities of a switching regulator. In this chapter, we will simulate the startup of the MIC28514 under different conditions and visualize the relevant waveform.

5.4.1 Analyze Start-up Time

Open the (MIC28514) Buck example, startup application schematic from Power Management > Switching Regulators > MIC28514.
Remove PVDD, VDD, PG, EN, FREQ, EXTVDD, SVIN, VIN, BST, ILIM, FB, IVIN, ISVIN, ICIN1, ICIN2, Icout1 and Icout2 probes and restore connections where needed.
Rename them as desired and use the same graph name for each.
Modify the value of the C15 output capacitor to 5 mF.
Simulate with the initial SS cap. Visualize what happens to the output voltage.
Modify the SS cap value in order to increase the startup time two times and then simulate again and observe the differences in startup.

Back to Top

5.5 Case Study: Stability and Load Step Response for COT Devices with Pure Ripple from the Feedback Resistors

What is the effect of the feedback resistors?

The values of FB resistors should be in kΩ range to avoid noise pick-up from switching. If the value of FB resistors is high, noise can couple to the FB node and ride on top of the ripple which will cause multi-pulsing and stability issues. We recommend choosing upper FB resistors in the range of 10kΩ and selecting lower FB resistors based on the required output voltage.

5.5.1 Analyze the stability and load step response

Open the (MIC28514) Buck example, AC Transient load step application schematic from Power Management > Switching Regulators > MIC28514.
Remove R15 resistor and C10 capacitor from the schematic.
Modify C1 capacitor value to 1.8 nF, C12 ESR to 30 mΩ and Quantity to 1 and C15 ESR to 50 mΩ and value to 470 µF.
Remove PVDD, VDD, PG, EN, FREQ, EXTVDD, SVIN, VIN, BST, ILIM, FB, IVIN, ISVIN, ICIN1, ICIN2, Icout1, and Icout2 probes, replacing inline probes with wires.
Rename them as desired and use the same graph name for each.
Simulate the setup. Visualize what happens to the output voltage during load transient.
Switch between graphs to visualize the AC response.

Back to Top

5.6 Case Study: External Ripple Injection Effect on Stability and Load Step Response for COT Devices

The VFB ripple required for proper operation of the internal gm amplifier and comparator is 20 mV to 100 mV. However, the output voltage ripple is generally designed as 1% to 2% of the output voltage. For low output voltages, such as 1 V, the output voltage ripple is only 10 mV to 20 mV and the feedback voltage ripple is less than 20 mV. If the feedback voltage ripple is so small that the gm amplifier and comparator cannot sense it, then the switcher loses control and the output voltage is not regulated. In order to have sufficient VFB ripple, a ripple injection method should be applied for low output voltage ripple applications. Additional ripple can be injected into the FB pin from the Switching Node, via a resistor RINJ and a capacitor CINJ as shown in the figure below.

vfb ripple

The injected ripple can be calculated with the following formula:

ripple injection formula

5.6.1 Analyze External Ripple Injection with Stability and Load Step Response

Open the (MIC28514) Buck example, AC Transient load step application schematic from Power Management > Switching Regulators > MIC28514.
Remove PVDD, VDD, PG, EN, FREQ, EXTVDD, SVIN, VIN, BST, ILIM, FB, IVIN, ISVIN, ICIN1, ICIN2, Icout1, and Icout2, replacing inline probes with wires.
Rename them as desired and use the same graph name for each.
Simulate the setup. Visualize what happens to the output voltage during load transient.
Switch between graphs to visualize the AC response.
Modify the External Ripple Injection resistor (R15) value to 25 k and simulate again and observe the differences for load transient and AC response.

AC response with different external Rinj values(16.2 k vs 25 k):

ripple frequency response

Load Step response with different external Rinj values(16.2 k vs 25 k):

load-step response

Back to Top

5.7 References

Datasheets

Evaluation Boards

Back to Top

Learn More

Back to Top